This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus, kept. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 15:48, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

---

Contents 1 Force kick (talk - history - links - logs) 2 Delete 3 Keep 4 Neutral 5 Discussion

Force kick (talk - history - links - logs)Edit

Move information into movie articles. Doesn't warrant a page of its own, to be quite honest. Precedent of Wookieepedia:Trash compactor/Emperor's slugs. Graestan^(Talk) 17:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

DeleteEdit

1. Graestan^(Talk) 17:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
2. Merge with and redirect to Return of the Jedi. -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 18:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
3. Darth Culator ^(Talk) 18:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
4. Wah wah wah. Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
5. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 21:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
6. Per Acky. Grunny ^(Talk) 22:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
7. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Jujiggum) 00:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
8. Insufficiently notable to have its own page. Redirect it to the ROTJ article and add the information there. Havac 19:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
9. IFYLOFD ^{(You will pay the price for your lack of vision!)} 03:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
10. Merge/Redirect to ROTJ per AdmirableAckbar and Havac.- Esjs^(Talk) 23:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
11. Imperialles 23:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

KeepEdit

1. Sorry, no. Even if it was Wookieepedia that introduced the term to me, I see it as being notable enough to have a page here. Just looks at how many people have a Force kick userbox. Besides, the article is actually well written and is interesting to read. Mauser^Comlink 17:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
2. —Darthtyler ^(Talk) 18:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
3. FWIW, I am only leaning slightly this way; because of its presence in fandom, I believe there is enough notable-ness. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 19:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
4. Per Mauser. QuiGonJinn^{There's always a bigger fish.} 07:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
5. Per all of Mauser's points. —Xwing328^(Talk) 03:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
6. Completely per Mauser. Cyfiero 04:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
7. --Darth tom (Imperial Intelligence) 11:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
8. Per Fiolli. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 19:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
9. Agree with Mauser, also perhaps merge with TK or any other established Force power article. All the article needs is references.JangFett ^Talk 01:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

1. Per Mauser and precedent. In other words, I agree with Mauser that this should be kept, yet we have the precedent that suggests this maybe should be deleted. Unless someone can convince me either way, I'm going to remain neutral here. Master Jonathan^{Jedi Council Chambers} 23:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

I would have little problem with deletion, upon further thought, should the article be shifted into WP:BJAODN like the Earth article. Then, add the necessary stuff to the RotJ. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 00:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)