Forum:TC:Non-notable Contispexes

Non-notable Contispexes

Contispex III (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex IV (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex V (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex VI (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex VII (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex VIII (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex IX (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex X (talk - history - links - logs)

Contispex XI (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex XII (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex XIII (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex XIV (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex XV (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex XVI (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex XVII (talk - history - links - logs) Contispex XVIII (talk - history - links - logs)

Same reason as the Pius Dea Crusades TC. We have numerous precedents for deleting this kind of stuff, and wikipedia:Pope John XX shows that it's entirely plausible that one (or more) of these might not even exist. —MJ— _{Council Chambers} Sunday, May 13, 2012, 02:30 UTC

Voting

Delete

1. As nominator. —MJ— _{Council Chambers} Sunday, May 13, 2012, 02:30 UTC
2. After reading the opinions and comments of other editors, I have to agree. I created these articles without considering their conjectural nature. Cade Calrayn 02:40, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
3. Agreed.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 02:51, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
4. If kept, the succession boxes should reflect the possibility of the occasional chancellor of the Contispex dynasty reigning under the name of Dave or Susan or whatever. —Silly Dan _(talk) 03:48, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
5. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 18:41, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
6. Contispex XI, Contispex XII, Susan I, Contispex XIII... -- Darth Culator ^(Talk) 19:06, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
7. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 20:23, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
8. —Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 22:23, May 13, 2012 (UTC)