This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.—Silly Dan (talk) 22:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Contents
A Knights Tales (talk - history - links - logs)[]
I'm quite frankly very tired of this article being in Special:Lonelypages. The external links to the supposedly existing site do not work, and the single working link to the forums... well there's a general lack of activity there. The page itself seems little more than an advertisement for the site and I can't say this forum is notable for any reason. At best it could be moved to the list of fan sites if the article is supposed to refer to the forums only, but the site itself does not exist.
Keep[]
Merge[]
Redirect[]
Delete[]
- Wildyoda 01:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ozzel 04:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Havac 04:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- jSarek 15:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- 15:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 15:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Atarumaster88 (Audience Chamber) 16:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unless further proof of notability is provided.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- The Broox 02:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- --Eyrezer 10:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Does not establish notability. -LtNOWIS 20:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I need a name (Complain here) 20:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- --Windu223 23:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- —Xwing328(Talk) 21:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments[]
Wookieepedia:Notability of fan projects says that a forum (which seems to be all the content here) needs at least 100 active users to be "notable." Looking at their top 50 posters, however, it seems most of them haven't contributed in months. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Archived talk page[]
- The correct use of an apostrophe is too difficult. ;) - 18:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- They've managed it in the site's text, but sadly the grammar is not strong with the banner artist - Kwenn 21:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
"Story So Far"[]
This section needs to be severely trimmed down, if not eliminated. The RPG group itself might be notable enough for an article, but the details of their RP story are not notable. Red XIV 02:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Don't Delete It[]
Why does it bother you? This has been placed in the websites category, and it doesn't screw up anything else, so why delete it? It gives a good description of the site. —Unsigned comment by Kwaun Se (talk • contribs).
- "A Knights Tales is an online Text Based RPG Site, Having currently over 500 Members the site is a growing success. It is currently on its 3rd Version (Rise of the Sith) A Knights Tales is an online Text Based RPG Site, Having currently over 500 Members the site is a growing success. It is currently on its 3rd Version (Rise of the Sith)" is a reasonable description of the site. The rest is unneccessary fluff that the article could do without. This is an encyclopedia, not a webring - Kwenn 21:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Move[]
Shouldn't this be "A Knight's Tales?" The way it is now makes no sense. -- Ozzel 21:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Yes, but there's a category for websites. And that's not a good description of the site, because it doesn't set it apart from the other sites.
As for that, a movie is copywritten, A Knight's Tale, and Invisionfree Forum Hosting doesn't allow for commas, apostrophes,and any other special characters inside a site name. My guess is that it's because of the adress.
- But it doesn't count for the site's banner. And, again, this isn't the place to advertise, so a description shouldn't be about "setting it apart from the other sites" - Kwenn 22:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Do you honestly believe that someone will type in A Knights Tales on Wookiepedia? Without prior knowledge of the site, it is only known to people who make Wiki articles, and AKT members. Also, the banner could not be any different, because it would take the name of a movie. Regardless of the context, that would be in violation of a copyright.
Needs Wookification[]
It reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedic site. Adding that now. (can't find the @#$% tilde on this damn laptop) -82 Airborne