This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep - Sikon [Talk] 17:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC).
Contents
Hrrooar[]
This thing is named after a onomatopoeia. Argh. --Imp 17:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Votes[]
Delete[]
- Delete --Imp 17:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- This just keeps getting funnier and funnier.... this should be phlagonked KEJ 17:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Keep[]
- Keep and rename. It is, after all, a canon creature. -- SFH 17:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- It exists, it just hasn't been named. It's no less canonical than Unknown tridactyl species. It should be renamed to something more encyclopedic, though, like Unnamed Seylottan arthopod —Darth Culator (talk) 18:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Rename per Darth Culator. It's a canon species. Furthermore, this one was critically important to the plot of Star Wars: Jango Fett. -LtNOWIS 21:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- rename P.h 04:48, 28 January 2006 (UTC)p.h