This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Consensus was narrow on this (less than 2/3rds in favour of keeping it) but we default to keep when there's no consensus anyway. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents
Military uniforms (talk - history - links - logs)[]
There is nothing here, and it doesn't say anything about the subject which is generalized, and we have other specific articles on this already. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep[]
- Keep as a disambig. -- SFH 07:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Might as well be a disambig. Wildyoda 00:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but rewrite as disambig, where it clearly has uses. jSarek 02:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Per everybody else. Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Disambig. JorrelFraajic 02:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- KEJ 21:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Could be useful if images and everything were put in showing ranks etc, but at least keep as disambig NighthawkLeader 07:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as disambig per SFH, JSarek, et al. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council 15:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite as disambiguation page. Evir Daal 13:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree --Jedimca0 (<insert name here>, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 13:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Merge[]
Redirect[]
Delete[]
- Riffsyphon1024 06:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Vryce 06:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ubiqtorate 21:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC) - this page could possibly serve as a disambiguation page, but as it stands it provides no information that is not common knowledge.
- 21:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Red XIV 06:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as it stands, though if recreated with content I could be persuaded otherwise. I just can't think of what genuine content could be added. —Silly Dan (talk) 23:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments[]
At best, this could serve as a disambig. -- SFH 07:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)