This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. --MarcK [talk]
Plotholes, References and Parodies to The Star Wars Saga[]
Already covered at References to Star Wars and Star Wars inconsistencies. Plus, the article name is simply awful. --Imp 18:44, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Why does it have to be deleted? Star wars Guy 14:55, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I just said that above... --Imp 19:58, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- It could just be a link to the other articles. Star Wars Guy 14:05 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Votes[]
- Delete --Imp 18:44, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kwenn 19:13, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC) -- None of the 'inconsistencies' are true anyway
- Delete--Xilentshadow900 19:58, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. IF it can be better worded and explained. It looks to be in a very POV format, so it needs to be cleaned up. The title might need changing as well. General Kenobi 20:47, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Everything in this article is already covered elsewhere, which is why I nominated it here. --Imp 22:34, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to References to Star Wars. jSarek 22:32, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Who will actually type out this? :P --Imp 22:34, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not worthy of being a redirect. - Sikon [Talk] 05:17, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Completely agre with Imperialles, it doesn't tell anything that is not already in the other two articles. --Thinortolan 14:07, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Admiral J. Nebulax 19:12, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Star Wars inconsistencies. MoffRebus 22:04, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, but please can someone make an article for Bart Wars? -- Riffsyphon1024 11:12, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)