This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect to Galactic Civil War. WhiteBoy 22:36, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
The Imperial War[]
- Sounds to me like someone just grabbed a bunch of isolated battles that occurred in the early Imperial era and made up a war to put them in. Delete - QuentinGeorge 11:27, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Votes[]
- The fact is that no source gives a name to the squirmishes spread during the early Imperial era. Delete --Thinortolan 12:46, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this non-war. - Sikon [Talk] 12:58, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless named in an official source (seems to me like disconnected battles at the tail end of the Clone Wars and Jedi Purge combined with the beginning of the Galactic Civil War.) — Silly Dan 13:46, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Tam 15:03, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, alone with all the battles it links to. Kuralyov 15:26, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Just looks like BF2 missions. --SparqMan 18:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Galactic Civil War. This conflict doesn't exist, but it's conceivable someone might search for "The Imperial War," looking for the conflict we saw in the Original Trilogy. jSarek 21:22, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Lock and redirect to Galactic Civil War. --MarcK [talk] 03:23, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Move to Imperial Conquest Era. It's a much better name.--Bly1993
- Redirect...since SparqMan already did it. :p WhiteBoy 22:36, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Comments[]
- I put this in, the reason being, it has been placed on Wikipedia and has not been deleted or nominated for deletion. If this article survives, would someone tell me how to put sources into an article? —Unsigned comment by 81.131.128.188 (talk • contribs).
- So the reson not to delete is: as nobody noticed on wikipedia that it is not official, it should not be deleted? Well... Adding sources is easy: insert a line with the caption ==Sources== after the text, then put the source with the format *''[[source X]]''. You can do it right now if you want, you don't have to wait to see if the article survives, in fact, with no official sources, it will not survive. The place to publish articles about fan creations is the sw fanon wiki. --Thinortolan 12:46, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- My sources are entered. Though I will admit, the name comes soley from Wikipedia. If you wish, we could rename the article. —Unsigned comment by 81.131.128.188 (talk • contribs).
- Please sign your posts. Great Scott, what is this nonsense doing on Wikipedia? By the way, you shouldn't duplicate appearances; if something is in the Appearances section, it shouldn't be in the Sources section. - Sikon [Talk] 12:58, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Though it may contain official-based texts, Wipidedia is not an official Star Wars source. I keep my vote to delete, official sources don't show that there is any named global conflict in that period of time (except the first sparks of the Galactic Civil War). I understand this is just fault of a lack of knowledge about the wiki, please take a deep look at Wookieepedia:Welcome,_newcomers --Thinortolan 13:04, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I would request assistance in deleting the corresponding Wikipedia article. - Sikon [Talk] 16:54, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- OK. Shall I create a list for these battles, or just put them in other categores. It makes no sense to have them deleted as well.
- I think the battles are legitimate, but we have articles on them already. — Silly Dan 18:08, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- If there's any additional info not posted in the established articles, you can add them, but there's no need for duplicate articles. VT-16 19:36, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)